Como Citar
Martínez-Osorio, P. A., Barana, M., Roeha-Carneiro, R., & Paschoarelli, L. C. (2017). Innovation, design, and social sustainability : new trends for local development in the contemporary world. Revista De Arquitectura (Bogotá), 19(2), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2017.19.2.1406
##article.license##

A Revista de Arquitectura está catalogada como uma publicação de acesso aberto. Mais informações >>>

Os autores conservarão os direitos autorais e garantirão à Revista de Arquitectura o direito de primeira publicação da obra, o qual estará simultaneamente sujeito à licença Creative Commons (Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional CC BY-NC).

Os autores assinarão uma licença não exclusiva de distribuição da versão da obra publicada mediante a assinatura do documento RevArq FP03 Autorização para reprodução de artigo.

O autoarquivamento estará de acordo com os critérios expressos pelo SHERPA/RoMEO e pela classificação verde.

Para ver esses lineamentos, por favor, consultar >>>

Resumo

Toma-se como ponto de partida as "contracorrentes" que Gui Bonsiepe visionava em 1978 sobre a prática do design. Revisa-se o aperfeiçoamento dessas ideias a partir da evolução do conceito de sustentabilidade, seu enfoque social e sua relação com a inovação e o design. Em correspondencia com as proposições de Bonsiepe, identificam-se mudanças no papel do design para atender a novas necessidades sociais; como exemplos, apresentam-se intervenções de design participativo e inovação social, que geram alternativas de desenvolvimento local na cidade contemporánea. Novas realidades tornam mais importantes as capacidades de construção de produtos intangíveis. A ação política do design é cada vez mais urgente; os designers são convocados a cumprir um papel protagonista na construção crítica da nova cidadania. Um novo campo de ação, o design social.

Palavras-chave:

Referências

Alexandre, C. B., Gómez, E. A., Valente, A. C. (2015). Interdisciplinary relationship between Designer and Craftsman based on Integrated Craft Manufacturing Systems. Procedia Engineering, 132, 1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.600

Barbero, S. y Cozzo, B. (2009). Ecodesign. Kõnigswinter: H. F. Ullmann.

Bologna (2014). Bologna regulation on public collaboration for urban commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons. Recuperado de http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf.

Bonsiepe, G. (1978). Teoría y práctica del diseño industrial. Elementos para una manualística crítica. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.

Campbell, W. (2014). Designs: An archaeology of "craft" as god term. Computers and Composition, 33, 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.07.002

Chen, D., Cheng, L., Hummels, C. y Koskinen, I. (2016). Social design: An introduction. International Journal of Design, 10, 1. Recuperado de: http://ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2622

Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social reassembling as design strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.075

El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: Re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.267

Abd Elrahman, Ahmed. (2016). Tactical urbanism "a pop-up local change for cairo's built environment". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216. https://doi.org/ Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.032

Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural innovation and local development: Matera as a cultural district. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.366

Fuad-Luke, A. (2010). Ecodesign: The Sourcebook (3 ed., Fully Revised). San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.

Guimarães, L. B. M. (2009). Design e sustentabilidade: Brasil: produção e consumo, design sociotécnico. Porto Alegre: FEENG/UFRGS. Recuperado de https://estudo-semdesign.emnuvens.com.br/design/article/view/369

Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social challenges: Social innovation through social responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences 21 (1), 27-38. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154

Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counterhegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04

Howaldt, J., Domanski, D. y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17 (6), 20-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n6p20-44.

Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities 'work'. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2),100-111 https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05

Ibarra Muñoz, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Economía UNAM, 11 (32), 3-20. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-952X2014000200001&lng=es&tlng

Kelkar, N. P y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01

Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Shortterm action, long-term change. Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1.

Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001

Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7 (2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06

Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Marttila, S. y Botero, A. (2016). Bees, drones and other Things in public space: strategizing in the city. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.03

Matei, C. S. (2014). Globalization - An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 542 -546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbs-pro.2014.08.207

Mcdonough, W. y Braungart, M. (2013). Cradle to cradle: criar e reciclar ilimitadamente. São Paulo: Gustavo Gili.

McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Working Paper Series, 27. Magill, South Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia. Recuperado de http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf

Monteiro, B. G. y Wagner, R. (2008)Design e inovação social. Estudos em Design, 16 (2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5151/9788580392647-01

Moura M., Pereira de Andrade, A. B., Jardim Tarozzo, M. y Muniz Ambiel, I. Design contemporâneo e o resgate da memória: projeto interdisciplinar, 12° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, Blucher Design Proceedings,2, 2869-2881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/despro-ped2016-0246

Mulgan G., Tucker, A. R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf

Napawan, N. C. y Snyder, B. (2016). # FOGWASTE: Participatory urbanism towards place-understanding. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 67. Recuperado de http://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/sdrj/article/view/sdrj.2016.92.02

Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous public space towards social sustainability in madurese urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.108

Pacheco, J. C., Barrero, G. E. y Gómez Vásquez, G. (2013). An eco-technological approach to handcraft production: Two cases in the colombian caribbean region. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, 10 (spe70), 115-129. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-14502013000100006&lng=en&tlng=en

Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of learning design for collaborative network activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.

Phills J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Social Innovation Review (pp. 33-43). Stanford: Stanford University.

Papanek, V. (1995). Arquitectura e Design -Ecologia e ética. Lisboa: Edições 70 (reimpresión 2007).

Pinho, M. (2013). Domingos Tótora. Rio de Janeiro: Papel & Tinta.

Pollice, F. (2016). Urban planning and architectural design for sustainable development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.068

Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: In search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.065

Sadat Sahragard Monfared, N., Hashemnejad, H. y Abbas Yazdanfar, S. (2015). Design principles in sustainable local community with security and socialization approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.119.

Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: Recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.382

Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: A case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.227

Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 128. https://doi.org/Doi:10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.07

Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I., Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155-160. https://doi.org/ Doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.024

Tung, F. W. (2012). Weaving with rush: Exploring Craft-design collaborations in revitalizing a local craft. International Journal of Design, 6 (3). Recuperado de http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1077

Unesco (2005). Designers meet artisans. A practical guide. New Delhi: Artesanías de Colombia, Unesco. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/images/0014/001471/147132EO.pdf

Yair, K., Press, M., Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: Crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22 (4), 377-394.

van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9 (2), 112-127. 2.https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06

Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia's neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.008

Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. Maria Cecília Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo & Dignidade (pp. 15-27). São Paulo: Olhares.

WWF Brasil (2016). O planeta precisa de 1,5 anos para regenerar os recursos renováveis que consumimos em um ano. Recuperado de: http://www.wwf.org.br/natureza_brasi-leira/especiais/pegada_ecologica/pegada_ecologicaglobal/

##submission.citations.for##

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

Sistema OJS 3 - Metabiblioteca |