PDF ES (Español (España))
FLIP
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
Revista de Arquitectura is an open access journal. More information...
Authors retain copyright and grant to the Revista de Arquitectura the right of first publication, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons (CC) BY-NC license.
Authors will sign a non-exclusive distribution license for the published version of the article by completing (RevArq FP03 Permission to Reproduce).
Self-archiving will comply with SHERPA/RoMEO guidelines and the Green classification.
To see in detail these guidelines, please consult...
Abstract
The disciplinary origins of design are resumed based on the dichotomy between the creative logics of an academic and the logics of a common man without academic training as a project architect. The investigative exercise has allowed to recognize that "built-in" cultural practices and collective bets, understood as an intention approved by a social group, can be seen as the substrate that determines the logics of the projective task that transforms the world. These assumptions were decisive at the moment of establishing the position that would define design as a "third area of human knowledge" from the twentieth century until today. The result of this research invites the reader to take a critical stance against the role of design seen as a discipline that oscillates between what is conceived from the logic of the trained project architect and what is completed by the hands of the worker, in a scenario of multiplicity of de facto coexistences that juxtapose one with the other in concrete places and in determined times.
References
Aicher, O. (2001). Analógico y digital. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Aicher, O. (1994). El mundo como proyecto. México: Gustavo Gili.
Allen, T. (2005). Archivo: Shakertown Craftsman Boxes [Fotografía]. Recuperado de https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Shakertown_Craftsman_Boxes_2005-05-27.jpeg
Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1 (1), 17-20. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90023-1
Archer, B. (1995). The nature of research. Codesign, Interdisciplinary Journal of Design, 1 (1), 6-13.
Banham, R. (1985). Teoría y diseño en la primera era de la máquina. Barcelona: Paidós.
Benjamin, W. (1973). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. Madrid: Taurus.
Brea, J. L. (2005). Estudios visuales. La epistemología de la visualidad en la era de la globalización. Madrid: Akal.
Buchanan, R. (1998). Education and professional practice in design. Design Issues, 14 (2),n 63-66.
Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design issues, 17 (4), 3-23.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies, 3 (4), 221-227.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg.
Debray, R. (2010). Vida y muerte de la imagen. Historia de la mirada en Occidente. Barcelona: Paidós.
Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J. y Stolterman, E. (2009). From design research to theory: Evidence of a maturing field. International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference.
Foucault, M. (1966/2010). El cuerpo utópico. Las heterotopías. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
García Canclini, N. (2001). Culturas híbridas. Estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Giedion, S. (1948/1978). La mecanización toma el mundo. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Hegel, G. (2010). La odisea del espíritu. Madrid: Círculo de Bellas Artes de Madrid.
Hernández, F. (2006). Campos, temas y metodologías para la investigación relacionada con las artes. En Gómez, M., Hernández, F. y Pérez, H. C. Bases para un debate sobre investigación artísitca (pp. 681-713). Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia.
Hobsbawm, E. (1998). Historia del siglo XX. Buenos Aires: Crítica.
Janssen, C. (2007). Das Fagus-Werkin Alfeld, Rückseite [Fotografía]. Recuperado de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FagusGropius_Hauptgebaeude_200705_wikirueckseite.jpg
Kant, E. (1790/1991). Crítica de la facultad de juzgar. Caracas: Monte Ávila Editores.
Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30 (1), 4-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001
Marinetti, F. T. (1909/2006). Critical Writings. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Montaner, J. M. (1997). La Modernidad superada: ensayos sobre arquitectura contemporánea. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
National Archives and Records Administration (1943). Women's Bureau [Fotografía]. Recuperado de https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:%22Line_up_of_some_of_women_welders_including_the_women%27s_welding_champion_of_Ingalls_(Shipbuilding_Corp.,_Pascagoula,_MS)_NARA_-_522890.jpg
Oyarzún, P (ed.) (1983). Textos estéticos: Immanuel Kant. Santiago de Chile: Andrés Bello.
Pallasmaa, J. (2012). La mano que piensa. Sabiduría existencial y corporal en la arquitectura. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
Pevsner, N. (2003). Pioneros del diseño moderno. Buenos Aires: E. I. SRL.
Platón (1994). La República o el Estado. Madrid: Ediciones Fontana.
SantÉlia (1914). Casa con ascensori esterni e sistemi di collegamento su piü piani stradali [Fotografía]. Recuperado de https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Casa_Sant'Elia.jpg
Saikaly, F. (2005, March). Approaches to design research: Towards the designerly way. En Sixth international conference of the European Academy of Design (EAD06). Bremen: University of the Arts. Recuperado de: http://ead.verhaag.net/fullpapers/ead06id187_2.pdf
Sevaldson, B. (2010). Discussions and movements in design research. FORMakademisk - Research Journal for Design and Design Education, 3 (1), 8-35. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.137
SiefkkinDR (2016). Model of the Plan Voisin for Paris by Le Corbusier displayed at the Nouveau Esprit Pavilion (1925) [Fotografía]. Recuperado de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plan_Voisin_model.jpg
Subirats, E. (1986). La flor y el cristal. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Reference by
_NARA_-_522890.jpg){kind=link}
