HTML PT (Português (Brasil))
PDF PT (PORTUGUES) (Español (España))
FLIP
XML (Español (España))
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Revista de Arquitectura is an open access journal. More information...
Authors retain copyright and grant to the Revista de Arquitectura the right of first publication, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons (CC) BY-NC license.
Authors will sign a non-exclusive distribution license for the published version of the article by completing (RevArq FP03 Permission to Reproduce).
Self-archiving will comply with SHERPA/RoMEO guidelines and the Green classification.
To see in detail these guidelines, please consult...
Abstract
Home office work has become routine in global society daily life as a result of the pandemic. In the new context, family living and living spaces had to be adapted for online remote activities. Initially positive, this modality was impacted by inadequate ergonomics and environment, and by anxiety and insecurity regarding the objectives and goals to be achieved, affecting physical and mental health, resulting in a consequent decrease in initial satisfaction and productivity fluctuations. Based on research carried out with home office users, this article analyzes the perception of these individuals about the productivity obtained in the adapted spaces. It demonstrates that the view on the constitution of this workplace does not correspond to what the literature recommends as pleasant and productive. As a result of the research, the article presents a way to improve and increase the productivity and health of its users, and proposes guidelines for the development of projects and adaptations of residential environments for home office, based on the concepts of neuroarchitecture, physical ergonomics and cognitive, biophilic design and user experience (UX). The application of the proposed guidelines will make it possible to create a healthy, productive environment suitable for the well-being of those who use it.
Keywords:
References
Alexandre, N. M. C. & Coluci, M. Z. O. (2011). Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16, 3061-3068. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (2020). Acessibilidade a edificações, mobiliário, espaços e equipamentos urbanos. ABNT/NBR 9050:2020. https://www.canoas.rs.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/norma-abnt-NBR-9050-2015-emenda-1-2020.pdf
Azzazy, S., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Naismith, N. & Doborjeh, Z. (2021). A critical review on the impact of built environment on users’ measured brain ac-tivity. Architectural Science Review, 64(4), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2020.1749980
Barros, A. (2020, 31 jul.).Trabalho remoto cai pela primeira vez com flexibilização do dis-tanciamento social. Agência IBGE Notícias. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/28417-trabalho-remoto-cai-pela-primeira-vez-com-flexibilizacao-do-distanciamento-social
Bower, I., Tucker, R. & Enticott, P. G. (2019). Impact of built environment design on emo-tion measured via neurophysiological correlates and subjective indicators: A sys-tematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp
Bragança, P. A. C. D. F. & Marcos, C. (2014). Conforto ambiental — Iluminação, cores, ergo-nomia, paisagismo e critérios para projetos. Editora Saraiva.
Brant, R. & Mourão, H. C. (2020). Desafios do teletrabalho na pandemia covid-19: quando o home vira office. Caderno de Administração, 28, Edição E, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.4025/cadadm.v28i0.53637
Choi, Y., Kim, M. & Chun, C. (2015). Measurement of occupants’ stress based on electro-encephalograms (EEG) in twelve combined environments. Building and Environ-ment, 88, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.003
Costa, L. V. (2013). Construction and validation of a scale of perception of success in ca-reer. Careers and People Magazine (ReCaPe), 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20503/recape.v3i1.15435
Eberhard, J. P. (2009a). Brain landscape: The coexistence of neuroscience and architecture. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331721.001.0001
Eberhard, J. P. (2009b). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62(6), 753-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environ-ment. Nature, 392(6676), 598-601. https://doi.org/10.1038/33402
Epstein, R., Harris, A., Stanley, D. & Kanwisher, N. (1999). Neuron. The parahippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron, 23(1), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80758-8
Gage, F. H. (2003, 8-10 maio). Neuroscience and architecture. Em AIA Convention. San Diego, Califórnia: AIA. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00612.2002
Gondim, S. & Borges, L. O. (2020). Significados e sentidos do trabalho do home-office: desafios para a regulação emocional. SBPOT, Temática, 5. http://emotrab.ufba.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SBPOT_TEMATICA_5_Gondim_Borges.pdf
Grinde, B. & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International journal of environmental research and public health, 6(9), 2332-2343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332
Guérin, F., Kerguelen, A., Laville, A., Daniellou, F. & Duraffourg, J. (2001). Compreender o trabalho para transformá-lo: a prática da ergonomia. Edgar Blucher.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2010). Censo Demográfico. Trabalho e Ren-dimento. https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/apps/mapa/
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2021). Desocupação, renda, afastamentos, trabalho remoto e outros efeitos da pandemia no trabalho. http://covid19.ibge.gov.br/pnad-covid/trabalho.php
Karakas, T. & Yildiz, D. (2020). Exploring the influence of the built environment on human experience through a neuroscience approach: A systematic review. Frontiers of Ar-chitectural Research, 9(1), 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.10.005
Kellert, S. R. (2012). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature con-nection. Island press.
Kellert, S. R. & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. Terrapin Bright LLC. https://biophilicdesign.umn.edu/sites/biophilic-net-positive.umn.edu/files/2021-09/2015_Kellert%20_The_Practice_of_Biophilic_Design.pdf
Liu, J., Chen, Q. & Dang, J. (2021). Examining risk factors related to digital learning and social isolation: Youth visual acuity in COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Global Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.7189%2Fjogh.11.05020
Mager, G. B. & Merino, E. (2012). A contribuição da ergonomia no design de home offices. http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/1839
Marinho, M., Libório, F. H. V. & Paschoarelli, L. C. (2021). Percepção de usuários de home office — Análises das demandas ergonômicas e recomendações para o design. Em: W. J. Jorge & I. P. de Souza, (orgs.), Ciências humanas, sociais e suas tecnologi-as: percepções teóricas e aplicações. [E-book, pp. 8-19]. Uniedusul. http://dx.doi.org/10.51324/86010718.1
Mendes, D. C., Hastenreiter Filho, H. N. & Tellechea, J. (2020). A realidade do trabalho ho-me office na atipicidade pandêmica. Revista Valore, 5, 160-191. https://revistavalore.emnuvens.com.br/valore/article/view/655
Neufert, E. (2013). Arte de projetar em arquitetura. (B. Franco, trad.; 18ª ed.). Gustavo Gili. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7278709/mod_resource/content/1/Neufert%20extrato.pdf
Ogata, A. J. N, Pinto, A. C., Pereira, V. S., Lourenço, V., Andrade, Y. & Malik, A. M. (2020). Relatório técnico I — Impacto na saúde e no bem-estar do trabalho em regime de home-office durante a pandemia de SARS-COVID-19. https://www.impacto.blog.br/site/wp-content/uploads /2020/08/relatorio-tecnico_saude-e-bem-estar-home-office_gv-saude_i_Ao.pdf
Paschoarelli, L. C. & Silva, J. C. P. (2006). Design ergonômico: uma revisão dos seus as-pectos metodológicos. Conexão-Comunicação e Cultura, 5(10). http://www.ucs.br/etc/revistas/index.php/conexao/article/view/223/214
Pallasmaa, J. (2009). Os olhos da pele: a arquitetura e os sentidos. Artmed Editora.
Rocha, R. (2020). Home office afeta saúde mental de 4 em cada 10 funcionários. O Tem-po. https://www.otempo.com.br/economia/home-office-afeta-saude-mental-de-4-em-cada-10-funcionarios-1.2415541
Segerstrom, S. C. & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune sys-tem: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.601
Silva, V. L. A. & Bormio, M. F. (2016). A importância do uso ergonômico da cor na interface ambiente x usuário. Em 1º Congresso Internacional de Ergonomia Aplicada. Blu-cher Engineering Proceedings, 3(3), 666-673. https://www.proceedings.blucher.com.br/article-details/a-importncia-do-uso-ergonmico-da-cor-na-interface-ambiente-x-usurio-25094
Solís, A. M. E. & Herrera, N. L. R. (2017). El espacio físico y la mente: Reflexión sobre la neuroarquitectura. Cuadernos de Arquitectura, 7(7), 41-47. http://cuadernos.uanl.mx/pdf/num7/CUADERNOS_2017_FULL.pdf
Tham, K. W. & Willem, H. C. (2010). Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness. Building and Environment, 45(1), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.002
The Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air conditioning Associations (REHVA) (2006). Rheva Guide, 6. https://www.rehva.eu/fileadmin/Promotional_material/Brochures/REHVA_new_brochure_04.03.2015.pdf
Tripi, S. & Mattei, G. (2020). COVID-19 and Public Administration: Implications of smart working for management and workers’ mental health. DEMB Working Paper Series, 171. Unimore. http://155.185.68.2/wpdemb/0171.pdf
Villarouco, V. & Andreto, L. F. M. (2008). Avaliando desempenho de espaços de trabalho sob o enfoque da ergonomia do ambiente construído. Prod., 18(3), 523-539. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132008000300009
Xiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G. & Roll, S. C. (2021). Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(3), 181. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FJOM.0000000000002097
Zarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S. & Hosseini, S. (2021). COVID-19 e as preferências de um lar sau-dável: o caso de residentes de apartamentos em Teerã. Journal of Building Engi-neering, 35, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102021
##submission.citations.for##
