HTML (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
XML (Español (España))
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Revista de Arquitectura is an open access journal. More information...
Authors retain copyright and grant to the Revista de Arquitectura the right of first publication, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons (CC) BY-NC license.
Authors will sign a non-exclusive distribution license for the published version of the article by completing (RevArq FP03 Permission to Reproduce).
Self-archiving will comply with SHERPA/RoMEO guidelines and the Green classification.
To see in detail these guidelines, please consult...
Abstract
Population growth is directly linked to construction, for this reason it is essential to be efficient with resources, all within a framework of sustainable development, and its adoption within construction processes is an important research topic. While research based on Post-Occupancy Surveys (POE) is a common way to address the issue, little is known about the way in which construction stakeholders perceive and incorporate efficient resource use practices into their activities. This paper shows the results of a Pre-Occupancy Survey (EPO) designed based on the LEED and BREEAM certifications, the Mexican standard NMX-AA-164-SCFI-2013, the Sustainable Building Construction Program (PCES), the Certification of Sustainable Buildings (CES) and Sustainable Construction Standards in Chile (ECSC). The survey was aimed at construction professionals in Mexico and Chile, finding that there is low knowledge and use of sustainable building tactics and it is concluded that the techniques they use are oriented to cost optimization.
References
AlSanad, S. (2015). Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Engineering, 969-983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.538
Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S. (2013). Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment, 68, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008
Basbagill, J., Flager, F., Lepech, M., & Fischer, M. (2013). Application of life-cycle assessment to early-stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Building and Environment, 60, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009
Buyle, M., Braet, J., & Amaryllis, A. (2013). Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 379-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001
CMMAD (1987). Nuestro futuro común. Alianza Editorial. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N87/184/67/IMG/N8718467.pdf?OpenElement
Coma, J., Pérez, G., Gracia, A., Burés, S., Urrestarazud, M., & Cabeza, L. (2016). Vertical greenery systems for energy savings in buildings: A comparative study between green walls and green facades. Building and Environment, 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.014
Durdyev, S., Zavadskas, E. K., Thurnell, D., Banaitis, A., & Ihtiyar, A. (2018). Sustainable construction industry in Cambodia: Awareness, drivers and barriers. Sustainability, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020392
Li, Y., Yang, L., He, B., & Zhao, D. (2014). Green building in China: Needs great promotion. Sustainable Cities and Society, 11, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.10.002
Molina, C. M. (2012). Evaluación de la sustentabilidad de la vivienda en México. https://centromariomolina.org/wp content/uploads/2012/09/14. Evaluaci%C3%B3nSustetabilidadViviendaM%C3%A9xico_fin.pdf
Motuzienė, V., Rogoža, A., Lapinskienė, V., & Vilutienė, T. (2016). Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.103
Nguyen, H.-T., Skitmore, M., Gray, M., & Zhang, X. (2017). Will green building development take off? An exploratory study of barriers. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.012
Ordás, J. (2020). Retos y oportunidades de la movilidad urbana del futuro. Economistas, 35-50.
Serpell, A., & Vera, J. K. (2013). Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers od sustainable construction in Chile. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 272-288. doi:10.3846/20294913.2013.798597
Sharma, M. (2018). Development of a ‘Green building sustainability model’ for green buildings in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.154
Stojanovska-Georgievska, L., Sandeva, I., & Spasevska, H. (2017). An empirical survey on the awareness of construction developers about green buildings in Macedonia (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Thompson, S. (1987). Sample size for estimating multinomial proportions. The American Statistician, 42-46.
Valdés, H., & Mellado, C. C. (2018). Proposed model of sustainable construction skills for engineers in Chile. Sustaninability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093093
Visuet, G. I. (2010). Efectos urbano-ambientales de la politica de vivienda en la Ciudad de México. Espiral, 49-59.
Watson, B., Karan Prasad, D., Dave, M., & Prasad, D. (2016). Performance and perception in prefab housing: An exploratory industry survey on sustainability and affordability. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310612303
Xuan, X. (2016). Study of indoor environmental quality and occupant overall comfort and productivity in LEED- and non-LEED–certified healthcare settings. Indoor and Built Enviroment, 544-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16684007
Reference by
