This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Revista de Arquitectura is an open access journal. More information...
Authors retain copyright and grant to the Revista de Arquitectura the right of first publication, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons (CC) BY-NC license.
Authors will sign a non-exclusive distribution license for the published version of the article by completing (RevArq FP03 Permission to Reproduce).
Self-archiving will comply with SHERPA/RoMEO guidelines and the Green classification.
To see in detail these guidelines, please consult...
Abstract
Architectural criticism is more commonly written by historians, academics of methodologies, professors who investigate creative processes. Just a few architects in the practice of the project propose to clarify the meanings of a work as an experience open to a creative process. What is proposed is to bring criticism closer to the knowledge, action and experience of project architects who investigate, reflect and inhabit the work while they are designing it. The article relates architectural discourse and intervention in the work of the Pinacoteca do Estado de São Paulo (1993-1998), a project by Paulo Mendes da Rocha (1928-2021), recognizing that, for the architect, the basis of the transformation of architecture lies in recognizing and renewing the historic building (1896/1900). Whether in the dialogue established between memory and tradition, contemporary time and its circumstances, or in the relationship of interdependence, necessary and transitive, between building and urban organism.
References
Butler, J. (2022). Que mundo é este?: Uma Fenomenologia Pandêmica. Editora Autêntica.
Eco, U. (1976). A poética da obra aberta. A obra aberta. Perspectiva (10ª ed.).
Fundación Mies van der Rohe. (2000). https://shopmies.com/en/fundacio-mies-van-der-rohe/14-2nd-mies-van-der-rohe-award-for-latin-american-architecture.html
Giedion, S. (1967). Espacio, tiempo y arquitectura. Origen y desarrollo de una nueva tradición. Reverte, S. A. Editor.
Hilberseimer, L. (1979). La arquitectura de la gran ciudad. Gustavo Gili.
Mendes Da Rocha, P. (2012). A construção do olhar de Paulo Mendes da Rocha. En P. Mendes Da Rocha y M. L. Villac (org.), Paulo
Mendes da Rocha com Maria Isabel Villac. América, cidade e natureza (pp. 27-87). Editora Estação Liberdade.
Mendes Da Rocha, P. (1986). Morar na era moderna. Projeto (n. 94), São Paulo.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). O olho e o espírito. Cosac & Naif.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1993). Fenomenología de la percepción. Planeta De Agostini.
Morin, E. (1993). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Gedisa.
Pareyson, L. (1993). Estética. Teoria da formatividade. Vozes.
UrbiPedia. Archivo de Architectura. (s. f.). Ramos de Azevedo. https://www.urbipedia.org/hoja/Ramos_de_Azevedo
Sontag, S. (1996). Contra la interpretación. En Contra la interpretación (pp. 25-39). Santillana.
Villac, M. I. (2016). Técnica, arte e questões fundamentais da existência. Considerações sobre o discurso de Paulo Mendes da
Rocha. Pós. Revista do Programa de Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Fauusp, 23(39), 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-2762.v23i39
Villac, M. I. (2002). La construcción de la mirada. Naturaleza, Ciudad y Discurso en la Arquitectura de Paulo Archias Mendes da Rocha [Tesis doctoral]. Barcelona, ETSAB UPC.
Zevi, B. (1996). Saber ver a arquitetura. Martins Fontes.
