HTML (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
XML (Español (España))
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Revista de Arquitectura is an open access journal. More information...
Authors retain copyright and grant to the Revista de Arquitectura the right of first publication, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons (CC) BY-NC license.
Authors will sign a non-exclusive distribution license for the published version of the article by completing (RevArq FP03 Permission to Reproduce).
Self-archiving will comply with SHERPA/RoMEO guidelines and the Green classification.
To see in detail these guidelines, please consult...
Abstract
The purpose of this reflection article is to investigate the concept of resilience as a resistance enhancer in the case of housing in a natural and socioeconomic post-disaster context, in Puerto Rico. Resilience/resistance are proposed as two stages of a possible, radical and hopeful process. The objectives of this paper are: to demonstrate what a resilient/resistant house looks like, what qualities constitute it and how it can enable real forms of physical and social resistance. The bibliographic review supports the definition of the problem and the relevance of the research, in addition to contributing some theoretical considerations on disaster, resilience and housing, and providing references to broaden the interpretation. The methodology consists mainly of the analysis of spatial agency processes and housing projects in Puerto Rico seeking to resist disaster. As part of the results, parameters are outlined so that the house can resist the disaster in all its facets.
References
Alexander, C. (1981). El modo intemporal de construir. Editorial Gustavo Gili. (Documento original: The timeless way of building. New York: Oxford University Press, publicado en 1979).
Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial agency: Other ways of doing architecture. Routledge.
Bhabha, H. (2002). El lugar de la cultura. Ediciones Manantial. (Documento original publicado en 1994).
Bloch, E. (2004). El principio esperanza. Trotta.
Boano, C., & Hunter, W. (2012). Architecture at Risk (?): The Ambivalent Nature of Post-Disaster Practice. Architectoni.Ca, 1(1),1-13.
Chiclana, I. (2011) Asomo de una memoria otra: un arenal que se hace barrio, un empeño obrero que se hace comunidad. En J. Lizardi Pollock & M. Schwegmann (Eds.), Espacios ambivalentes: historias y olvidos en la arquitectura social contemporánea (pp. 229-244). Ediciones Callejón.
Diprose, K. (2014). Resilience is futile: The cultivation of resilience is not an answer to austerity and poverty. Soundings: A journal of politics and culture, 58, 44-56. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/565757.
Escobar, A. (2016). Autonomía y diseño: la realización de lo comunal. Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
Freire, P. (1994). Educación y participación comunitaria. En Nuevas perspectivas críticas en educación (pp. 83-96). Paidós.
Habraken, J. (2000). El diseño de soportes (2ª ed.). Editorial Gustavo Gili. (Documento original publicado en 1974).
Heidegger, M. (1994). Construir, habitar, pensar [Conferencias y artículos]. Serbal (documento original publicado en 1954).
Klein, N. (2007). La doctrina del shock. El auge del capitalismo del desastre. Ediciones Paidós.
Pallasmaa, J. (1995). Identity, intimacy and domicile - notes on the phenomenology of home. En N. D. Benjamin (Ed.), The Home; Words, Interpretations, Meanings and Environments (pp. 131-147). Avebury.
Rapoport, A. (1972). Vivienda y cultura. Editorial Gustavo Gili. (Documento original publicado en 1969).
Rapoport, A. (2000). Theory, culture and housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 17(4), 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/140360900300108573
Reghezza-Zitt, M., Rufat, S., Djament-Tran, G., & Le Blanc et Serge Lhomme, A. (2012). What resilience is not: Uses and abuses? Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 621. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.25554
Rodríguez, L. M. (2012). [Re]visión de la vivienda social en San Juan: Notas de la arquitectura para el obrero. En J. Lizardi Pollock & M. Schwegmann, Espacios Ambivalentes: historias y olvidos en la arquitectura social contemporánea (pp. 156-184). Ediciones Callejón.
Rozario, K. (2005). Making progress: Disaster narratives and the art of optimism in Modern America. En L. J. Vale & T. J. Campanella, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford University Press. https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780195175844.001.0001/isbn-9780195175844-book-part-6
Rybczynski, W. (1986). La casa: historia de una idea. Editorial Nerea.
Till, J., & Schneider, T. (2007). Flexible housing. Architectural Press.
Smithson, A., & Smithson, P. (1972). Signs of occupancy. Architectural Design,(2).https://www.pidgeondigital.com/talks/signs-of-occupancy/
Steinberg, T. (2006). Acts of God: The unnatural history of disaster in America. Oxford University Press.
Sosa Pascual, O. (2017, 7 de diciembre). Se disparan en casi mil las muertes tras María. CPI Centro de Periodismo Investigativo. https://periodismoinvestigativo.com/2017/12/se-disparan-en-casi-mil-las-muertes-tras-maria/
Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. J (Eds.). (2005). The cities rise again, in the resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford University.
Reference by
